On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, 23:37 Pedro Neves, <nevesdi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21-02-2017 21:28, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > The question becomes: should I leave Transifex source strings unchanged, > > create a 4.6 branch, cherry pick the hand full of bug fixes in master > that > > came in since 4.6.2 (three commits from Linus, a couple from Robert, one > > from Jan) and create a 4.6.3 based on that? Or should I push the updated > / > > improved strings that we have in master to Transifex (which means ALL the > > languages will have to do more work in order to get back to 100%) and > > stick with releasing master. > > > I prefer the 2nd option (push the updated /improved strings that we have > in master to Transifex), even if it means extra work. But, I'll go with > the majority... > > Cheers: > > Pedro > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface My 2 cents would be that the 2nd option of pushing the new strings would be best. Benjamin
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface