On 04/01/2018 12:10, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
Hello Willem,
One more comment about the overall ICD info idea here:
In your last version (see GitHub PR) you now also added dpN_2
I also like this and it follows Antons suggestion on the ML. He was
saying some may consider dpInert also as important.
What I would try to do in terms of layout (and check if we finally
like it or not):
Add dpN_2 and also dpHe but stack it into the same table cell as dN_2
% and also dHe%:
runtime
gaschange
dHe% / dpHe dN_2 % / dpN_2 max dN_2 %
15min
xxx->xxx
-xx.x%
-x.xxbar
-xx.x%
-x.xxbar +xx.x%
Best regards
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
I received all your and Jan's comments. Thank you for your time. With
respect to the above suggestions, two points.
1) dInert% and dpInert (bar) have no meaning with respect to ICD because
ICD is due to unbalanced choices of gas WITHIN the inert gases that make
up the trimix. dpInert is simply the dpO2 that has no meaning with
respect to ICD. I am always open to be convinced, but I strongly argue
that dpInert would not contribute at all to the ICD information.
2) I have sympathy with the two-line suggestion in the table above, but
we would need a way to separate the groups of two lines so that it is
clear which two lines belong together. I can control this with a
|style="height:15px;"|
but this is notoriously unstable in IE.
Any last comments before I do the recommended edits and re-submit a PR?
(I am out of contact starting tomorrrow until Monday)
Kind regards,
willem
--
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer.
Please refer to
http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf for full
details.
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
