Teus Benschop wrote: > Yes, I agree that ideally > Bibledit should become a "native" sugar applications, but probably in a > later stage.
This brings forward a more general question about how we want to deal with legacy apps. They work now with manual tinkering, but without a concrete model of how to deal with them, they simply won't work once we start implementing the security features. Chris, any thoughts on legacy apps from your end? -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
