Ivan Krstić wrote:
Teus Benschop wrote:
  
Yes, I agree that ideally
Bibledit should become a "native" sugar applications, but probably in a
later stage.
    

This brings forward a more general question about how we want to deal
with legacy apps. They work now with manual tinkering, but without a
concrete model of how to deal with them, they simply won't work once we
start implementing the security features.
  
Implementing security features to block legacy applications, that sounds frightening to me. That means no application will run on Sugar unless it is fully compliant. Friends, what are you doing to us, legacy developers? :)

Teus.


_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar

Reply via email to