Teus Benschop wrote: > Implementing security features to block legacy applications
Not at all; that legacy apps wouldn't work by default is merely a side-effect of the fact that installing and launching programs will work somewhat differently on our systems than it does on regular UNIX boxes. Now, the security console will let users disable security mechanisms, including the one responsible for the above, but that's not what I was asking about. I'm asking whether Chris has thoughts on how much effort we want to expend on supporting legacy apps in general, since it's doable (from the security side of things) to run legacy apps without having to turn off the protections, it just requires some work. -- Ivan Krstić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 0x147C722D _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/sugar
