On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> That sounds good to me. >> More specifically, Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk. >> It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I >> can't commit to trunk - #8588) >> Another example is pippy; it hasn't had even branch. >> >> I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here. >> If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific >> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up >> with it. > > I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not. > > If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed. > If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we > will get them fixed up (one way or another). > > For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle > should just point to master for 0.82... > > Sayamindu, does that make sense to you?
Yeah, it does make sense. In fact that's what we do right now. However, there can be git conflicts, so I would _highly recommend_ branching :-) -sdg- -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar