On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> That sounds good to me. >>>> More specifically, Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk. >>>> It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I >>>> can't commit to trunk - #8588) >>>> Another example is pippy; it hasn't had even branch. >>>> >>>> I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here. >>>> If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific >>>> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up >>>> with it. >>> >>> I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not. >> I can understand this. But Then, please do not make separated >> project on Pootle at first place when the author isn't thinking about >> branching :-< You could postpone branching on Pootle project until >> it is actually needed. >> >> And please announce when translator should use trunk on Pootle for >> specific Fulctose activitiy. >> For example; if improvement to an activity targetted to 8.2.1 needs >> string addition, which Pootle project to use for translation? >> >>> >>> If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed. >>> If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we >>> will get them fixed up (one way or another). >> Assuming conflict has now resolved for Calculate, please think about Pippy. >> >>> For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle >>> should just point to master for 0.82... >> As I wrote above, the fact would be clear to translators if there >> is PO only Fulctose project on Pootle and not in Fulctose0.82. >> >>> >>> Sayamindu, does that make sense to you? >>> >>> Marco >>> >> > > I think the best approach here would be to symlink the master > directory to 0.82 directory for activities which do not have a 0.82 > branch yet. In that way, what pootle will see as pippy-0.82 will be > actually a branch to pippy-master. > > Do you think that covers our current problem ? I am not convinced; What does it make sense to have 0.82 on Pootle (while it might be symlink to master) if author doesn't think of branch?
/Korakurider > Thanks, > Sayamindu > > > -- > Sayamindu Dasgupta > [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
