On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> That sounds good to me. >>> More specifically, Calculate-24 recently announced was built from trunk. >>> It is sad to see translation in branch just skipped :-< (And I >>> can't commit to trunk - #8588) >>> Another example is pippy; it hasn't had even branch. >>> >>> I am NOT calling them bad, I just think there is confusion here. >>> If you say about intention to stick with trunk for specific >>> activity BEFORE you build release, translator could manage to keep up >>> with it. >> >> I expect some activity authors will want to branch and some will not. > I can understand this. But Then, please do not make separated > project on Pootle at first place when the author isn't thinking about > branching :-< You could postpone branching on Pootle project until > it is actually needed. > > And please announce when translator should use trunk on Pootle for > specific Fulctose activitiy. > For example; if improvement to an activity targetted to 8.2.1 needs > string addition, which Pootle project to use for translation? > >> >> If we branched and then released from master then clearly we screwed. >> If you can provide a list of modules which are in this situation we >> will get them fixed up (one way or another). > Assuming conflict has now resolved for Calculate, please think about Pippy. > >> For modules that doesn't have a sucrose-0.82 branch, I think pootle >> should just point to master for 0.82... > As I wrote above, the fact would be clear to translators if there > is PO only Fulctose project on Pootle and not in Fulctose0.82. > >> >> Sayamindu, does that make sense to you? >> >> Marco >> >
I think the best approach here would be to symlink the master directory to 0.82 directory for activities which do not have a 0.82 branch yet. In that way, what pootle will see as pippy-0.82 will be actually a branch to pippy-master. Do you think that covers our current problem ? Thanks, Sayamindu -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
