Hi Joerg, I think the problem should be fixable by doing the following two things: - set option "--ride.stop-tolerance 0" (whereas the default is 10m) - define a narrow range for the vehicle stop (startPos, endPos). Note, that you can pick up persons waiting at a busStop even if the vehicle stop is defined with (lane, startPos, endPos).
The ride.stop-tolerane is checked for entry and egress and should also prevent getting out too early. If you cannot get it to work with these suggestions, please send a small scenario that shows the problem. cheers, Jakob Am Mo., 30. Mai 2022 um 10:21 Uhr schrieb joerg <[email protected]>: > Dear all, > > I observed some unexpected behavior at stops: > > 1. persons can enter or leave vehicles at stops, even though the vehicle > is not at the lane where the stop is attached to, but also on lanes with > a higher lane index (means they jump from the platform across lanes into > the vehicle). > > 2. I noticed that persons jump into vehicles even before they reached > their edge-position according to the plan. The only condition to board > seems to be that a vehicles stops in the defined position-range and a > person just happens to be in this range when the vehicle stops. This > seems to occur in more recent SUMO versions. > > Unfortunately with such a behavior I cannot selectively pick up persons > with vehicles at dedicated positions, or just park vehicles at certain > positions. > > I've been complaining about this behavior some time ago. I found a > workaround, but especially the second behavior makes it impossible to do > what I intend. For my purpose access lists do not help, and changing > vehicle capacity dynamically through TraCi is not possible. > > So maybe someone of you did find a way to handle this type of problem. > Otherwise I'd ask if it were a big issue to change code, there may be > some really simple ways of fixing: > > - board only if vehicle is on the lane of the stop > > - allow change vehicle capacity through TraCi (one could lock the > vehicle by setting capacity to 0 or to the number of persons already in > the vehicle, but that would not prevent persons jumping off the vehicle > whenever it stops) > > - adding a Lock attribute to the vehicle, this would be the best > solution and also closest to reality. > > Thanks as always for any ideas on this matter. > > Best wishes, > > Joerg > > > > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
