It has nothing to do with sensors/computing. You can set an average extra
consumer power in the battery device settings, but this is not influenced
by the CFM.
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Datum: 2022-08-08T15:28:43+0200
Von: "Radha Reddy" <[email protected]>
An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Many thanks Mirko,
You mean both ACC and Krauss vehicles are electric vehicles ( After
switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only
0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle )?
In my scenarios, I let Krauss be the ICEV/BEV and ACC be the BEAV. I tested
two scenarios 1. Mixed ICEV (Krauss) and BEV (Krauss) and 2. Mixed ICEV
(Krauss) and BEVs (ACC) for an hour simulation. Finally, I have considered
the average result of one simulation hour and compared the battery
electricity consumption. So I tried checking how individual vehicles
consume when there are no traffic signals assigned (free flow) by mixing
ICEV/BEV and Krauss/ACC.
I got the results of ACC BEV being the highest electricity consumer 8.8Wh
than the Krauss BEV in the signal-free road. My question is if this high
consumption is related to the sensors/computing or the higher speed of ACC?
I am sorry for asking the same question.
Regards
Radha
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
Well I don't see that much of weird behaviour in this example. After
switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only
0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle. It drives faster for some time
also when it wants to overtake. By the way: You used a lane change
parameter (lcLaneDiscipline) belonging to the sublane model but didn't
activate that one.
Best regards
Mirko
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Datum: 2022-08-08T11:31:27+0200
Von: "Radha Reddy" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
An: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Hello Mirko,
Please check the attached zip file, in which I have attached a different
network file, a 2x2 grid network of intersections in which only 3
vehicles are injected using flow definition (2 HVs - Krauss CFM and 1 AV
- ACC CFM). I assigned only the green light to let these 3 vehicles pass
without stopping. All vehicles cross straight at intersection 0, turn
right at intersection 2, cross straight at intersection 3, and exit the
network.
We can observe the weird behavior of the ACC vehicle at intersection 2
when it turns right side.
REgards
Radha
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 10:16 AM [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
Hi Radha,
I would like to take a closer look on your example scenario. Do you
want to share the files?
Best regards
Mirko
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Datum: 2022-08-08T10:09:41+0200
Von: "Radha Reddy" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
An: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "Sumo
project User discussions" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Many thanks Mirko, for your information.
My test network is an isolated intersection with each road from the
intersection being 500meters in length. My intention was how the
human-driven (Krauss) and Autonomous-driven (ACC) vehicles consume
battery electricity. The human vehicle exhibits jerky driving behavior
while the autonomous vehicle utilizes its maximum speed without jerky
behavior.
The electricity consumption of ACC is strange that in the straight
lane, it consumes ~0.57 while turning to the right/left, consuming 20
times extra from 10 to 15 (for 3 to 4 seconds, the time required to
cross the intersection). In Krauss CFM, it is of utmost 5 and recovers
some energy when there is a jerk.
In the literature, the higher electricity consumption of autonomous
vehicles is related to the power consumption of sensors and computing
for autonomous driving. My question is if the ACC has a similar
explanation.
Regards
Radha
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:48 AM [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
Hi,
these are different CFM generating different speed profiles. So it
should be expected that electricity consumption may differ. The
difference does not sound very big either, as it is in the range of a
few % of an average consumption per km. Still depends on how your
test network looks like, though.
Best regards
Mirko
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Datum: 2022-08-06T23:04:43+0200
Von: "Radha Reddy" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
An: "Sumo project User discussions" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Hello,
I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by
Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I
compared the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles
consumed more than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any
explanation for this?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards
Radha
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
<https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user>
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
