Hello, the crash appears to be resolved by changes in the latest svn revision (not just related to slight changes in driving dynamics). regards, Jakob
2014-02-19 8:26 GMT+01:00 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>: > Hello, > thank for for reporting the crash and sending the files.. I was able to > reproduce it with 0.19.0 and will look into the matter. As a workaround you > may want to use the latest svn version which ran the scenario without > crashing. > > Please note that the option --lanechange.duration which you are using is > rather new and bugs were recently discovered: ( > http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1152, > http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1153). > > Regarding the problem of unsorted vehicles in the dfrouter output, please > look at the updated documentation here: > http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files > As Daniel mentioned we do not use DFRouter very often, which is why this > annoyance is not yet fixed. (But here is a ticket: > http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1158 because I do think it is a > defect) > regards, > Jakob > > > 2014-02-17 14:35 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: > > Hello, >> >> Giving the route and vehicle file to SUMO both via the "-r " flag in the >> correct order solved the errors. But now I am running into a different >> problem again. When running SUMO I get a lot of warnings about discarded >> vehicles because the route file is not sorted. Apart from that, the >> simulation runs and exits normally. So again I run into the problem of the >> route file not being sorted, although it is generated by DFRouter and I did >> not alter it. Because thousands of vehicles are discarded, the scenario >> output becomes unreliable for me. >> >> Now I guess a simple way to solve this is to put both the route and >> vehicle file in the list of additional files in the correct order. This >> simple solution works, the errors about the unsorted route file do not >> occur. But when running the simulation now, the simulation suddenly closes >> with a segmentation fault after 1503 steps. This happens repeatedly and >> both with and without GUI. Apart from some warnings about teleported >> vehicles and changed depart speeds because of close by junctions, the >> simulation seems to run normally up to the segmentation fault. So I guess I >> ran into another bug? I added the scenario for which the segmentation fault >> occurs. I simplified the scenario by removing some files and flags again >> and checked that the fault still occurs. The scenario can be run by running >> sumo or sumo-gui on the provided configuration file. >> >> Greetings, >> Pieter >> >> >> On 5 February 2014 12:52, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> I think I have finally figured out the underlying misunderstanding. >>> Please read the following (new) documentation: >>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/SUMO#Loading_order_of_input_files >>> >>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files >>> regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-02-04 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hello, >>>> regarding 1) >>>> in config-files, >>>> <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/> and >>>> <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/> should both work. What >>>> error message do you get? >>>> >>>> regarding 2) >>>> most likely there is something wrong with the route file itself. It >>>> should generally be possible to use the -r option for route files. >>>> Only if the routes are unsorted (wrt departure time) you need to use -a >>>> because -a does not perform incremental loading but loads the whole file >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> Note, that in your route file any <route> elements must come before >>>> <vehicle route=""> elements referencing the former. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-02-04 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I just tried using the --save-configuration option for both DFRouter >>>>> and >>>>> SUMO. It succesfully creates a config file, but I ran into a few small >>>>> problems. >>>>> >>>>> Problem 1: >>>>> >>>>> I know that the additional files in a .sumocfg file is a >>>>> space-separator >>>>> list, like this: >>>>> <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/> >>>>> >>>>> Now, in whatever way I try to give the additional files as flag to a >>>>> sumo >>>>> command, it keeps saving it to the config file in the wrong format. As >>>>> far >>>>> as I know the flag for additional files should be a comma-separated >>>>> list, >>>>> like this: >>>>> sumo -a file1,file2,file >>>>> >>>>> But when I run the command and look at the produced config file, I see >>>>> that >>>>> the commas are stll there, it looks like this: >>>>> <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/> >>>>> >>>>> So there are still commas in between, and running SUMO with this config >>>>> file gives errors that I do not receive when the list is >>>>> space-separated. I >>>>> tried a few different ways of formatting the "-a <FILE>" using commas >>>>> or >>>>> spaces as separator with and without enclosing braces, brackets or >>>>> quotes, >>>>> but the generated format is never correct. Am I doing something wrong? >>>>> >>>>> Problem 2: >>>>> >>>>> When generating the sumo config file, using the flag "-r <FILE>" to >>>>> give >>>>> the route file, then the route file is written as >>>>> <route-files value=file/> >>>>> >>>>> But when running SUMO using the generated config file, errors occur >>>>> about >>>>> invalid references to routes. The only solution seems to be to give the >>>>> route file under the "-a <FILE>" flag. If the route file should be an >>>>> additional file, then please fix the config generation process or >>>>> change >>>>> the documentation about providing the route file. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Pieter >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications >>>>> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. >>>>> Read the Whitepaper. >>>>> >>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
