Hello Pieter, What about obtaining commit rights and patching it by yourself? We'd need your sf account name. It got outdated and as no test was available, no one noticed.
Sincerely, Daniel 2014-02-19 20:31 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > Ah, that makes sense. However, the output also contains an error. The > complete list of vehicle definitions is in a block comment, since the > configuration comments at the start of the file are not properly closed > before the vehicle definitions are written. I attached the file that > sort_routes.py generated, I only removed all vehicles in between the first > and the last one. > > In the python code I see that the original lines are copied until it reads > "<routes". But in comment lines there is a flag definition "<routes-output" > so the copying ends at that line unintendedly. Apart from that, all the > route distributions and vehicle definitions in the file that dfrouter > generated start after a line with "<additional>" instead of "<routes>". So > I guess the python file should be altered a bit here. I fixed the python > file for my case, I'm not sure how generic it is. But I attached the > changed python file so you can have a look at it. I only changed the > contents of the for-loop in the main method. > > Greetings, > Pieter > > > On 19 February 2014 16:03, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> you need to sort the emitters file (containing <vehicle> elements). >> regards, >> Jakob >> >> >> 2014-02-19 12:15 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Thank you for the useful reactions, I see there is a tool for sorting the >>> route file. However, when I run sort_routes.py I get the output "read 0 >>> elements. wrote 0 elements." and no errors. The output file that is >>> generated contains some comments, but no route data. Now that I think of >>> it, doesn't the python script need the vehicle file in order to be able to >>> sort the routes? >>> >>> I read these reactions just after I sent a mail with an overview of my >>> bug reports (which also includes this scenario as "sumo_segfault" but then >>> with screenshot and reduced vehicle file size). So if the crash problem we >>> are discussing is solved already then you can ignore this scenario that I >>> just sent again in my bug overview message. >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Pieter >>> >>> >>> On 19 February 2014 09:16, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> the crash appears to be resolved by changes in the latest svn revision >>>> (not just related to slight changes in driving dynamics). >>>> regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-02-19 8:26 GMT+01:00 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>>> thank for for reporting the crash and sending the files.. I was able to >>>>> reproduce it with 0.19.0 and will look into the matter. As a workaround >>>>> you >>>>> may want to use the latest svn version which ran the scenario without >>>>> crashing. >>>>> >>>>> Please note that the option --lanechange.duration which you are using >>>>> is rather new and bugs were recently discovered: ( >>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1152, >>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1153). >>>>> >>>>> Regarding the problem of unsorted vehicles in the dfrouter output, >>>>> please look at the updated documentation here: >>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files >>>>> As Daniel mentioned we do not use DFRouter very often, which is why >>>>> this annoyance is not yet fixed. (But here is a ticket: >>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1158 because I do think it is a >>>>> defect) >>>>> regards, >>>>> Jakob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-02-17 14:35 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Giving the route and vehicle file to SUMO both via the "-r " flag in >>>>>> the correct order solved the errors. But now I am running into a >>>>>> different >>>>>> problem again. When running SUMO I get a lot of warnings about discarded >>>>>> vehicles because the route file is not sorted. Apart from that, the >>>>>> simulation runs and exits normally. So again I run into the problem of >>>>>> the >>>>>> route file not being sorted, although it is generated by DFRouter and I >>>>>> did >>>>>> not alter it. Because thousands of vehicles are discarded, the scenario >>>>>> output becomes unreliable for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now I guess a simple way to solve this is to put both the route and >>>>>> vehicle file in the list of additional files in the correct order. This >>>>>> simple solution works, the errors about the unsorted route file do not >>>>>> occur. But when running the simulation now, the simulation suddenly >>>>>> closes >>>>>> with a segmentation fault after 1503 steps. This happens repeatedly and >>>>>> both with and without GUI. Apart from some warnings about teleported >>>>>> vehicles and changed depart speeds because of close by junctions, the >>>>>> simulation seems to run normally up to the segmentation fault. So I >>>>>> guess I >>>>>> ran into another bug? I added the scenario for which the segmentation >>>>>> fault >>>>>> occurs. I simplified the scenario by removing some files and flags again >>>>>> and checked that the fault still occurs. The scenario can be run by >>>>>> running >>>>>> sumo or sumo-gui on the provided configuration file. >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>> Pieter >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5 February 2014 12:52, Jakob Erdmann >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> I think I have finally figured out the underlying misunderstanding. >>>>>>> Please read the following (new) documentation: >>>>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/SUMO#Loading_order_of_input_files >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files >>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>> Jakob >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-02-04 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> regarding 1) >>>>>>>> in config-files, >>>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/> and >>>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/> should both work. What >>>>>>>> error message do you get? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regarding 2) >>>>>>>> most likely there is something wrong with the route file itself. It >>>>>>>> should generally be possible to use the -r option for route files. >>>>>>>> Only if the routes are unsorted (wrt departure time) you need to use >>>>>>>> -a because -a does not perform incremental loading but loads the whole >>>>>>>> file >>>>>>>> instead. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Note, that in your route file any <route> elements must come before >>>>>>>> <vehicle route=""> elements referencing the former. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>> Jakob >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2014-02-04 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I just tried using the --save-configuration option for both >>>>>>>>> DFRouter and >>>>>>>>> SUMO. It succesfully creates a config file, but I ran into a few >>>>>>>>> small >>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Problem 1: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know that the additional files in a .sumocfg file is a >>>>>>>>> space-separator >>>>>>>>> list, like this: >>>>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, in whatever way I try to give the additional files as flag to >>>>>>>>> a sumo >>>>>>>>> command, it keeps saving it to the config file in the wrong format. >>>>>>>>> As far >>>>>>>>> as I know the flag for additional files should be a comma-separated >>>>>>>>> list, >>>>>>>>> like this: >>>>>>>>> sumo -a file1,file2,file >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But when I run the command and look at the produced config file, I >>>>>>>>> see that >>>>>>>>> the commas are stll there, it looks like this: >>>>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So there are still commas in between, and running SUMO with this >>>>>>>>> config >>>>>>>>> file gives errors that I do not receive when the list is >>>>>>>>> space-separated. I >>>>>>>>> tried a few different ways of formatting the "-a <FILE>" using >>>>>>>>> commas or >>>>>>>>> spaces as separator with and without enclosing braces, brackets or >>>>>>>>> quotes, >>>>>>>>> but the generated format is never correct. Am I doing something >>>>>>>>> wrong? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Problem 2: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When generating the sumo config file, using the flag "-r <FILE>" to >>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>> the route file, then the route file is written as >>>>>>>>> <route-files value=file/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But when running SUMO using the generated config file, errors occur >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> invalid references to routes. The only solution seems to be to give >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> route file under the "-a <FILE>" flag. If the route file should be >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> additional file, then please fix the config generation process or >>>>>>>>> change >>>>>>>>> the documentation about providing the route file. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> Pieter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications >>>>>>>>> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common >>>>>>>>> Pitfalls. >>>>>>>>> Read the Whitepaper. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > Read the Whitepaper. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
