Hello,
you need to sort the emitters file (containing <vehicle> elements).
regards,
Jakob


2014-02-19 12:15 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>:

> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the useful reactions, I see there is a tool for sorting the
> route file. However, when I run sort_routes.py I get the output "read 0
> elements. wrote 0 elements." and no errors. The output file that is
> generated contains some comments, but no route data. Now that I think of
> it, doesn't the python script need the vehicle file in order to be able to
> sort the routes?
>
> I read these reactions just after I sent a mail with an overview of my bug
> reports (which also includes this scenario as "sumo_segfault" but then with
> screenshot and reduced vehicle file size). So if the crash problem we are
> discussing is solved already then you can ignore this scenario that I just
> sent again in my bug overview message.
>
> Greetings,
> Pieter
>
>
> On 19 February 2014 09:16, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> the crash appears to be resolved by changes in the latest svn revision
>> (not just related to slight changes in driving dynamics).
>> regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-19 8:26 GMT+01:00 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Hello,
>>> thank for for reporting the crash and sending the files.. I was able to
>>> reproduce it with 0.19.0 and will look into the matter. As a workaround you
>>> may want to use the latest svn version which ran the scenario without
>>> crashing.
>>>
>>> Please note that the option --lanechange.duration which you are using is
>>> rather new and bugs were recently discovered: (
>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1152,
>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1153).
>>>
>>> Regarding the problem of unsorted vehicles in the dfrouter output,
>>> please look at the updated documentation here:
>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files
>>> As Daniel mentioned we do not use DFRouter very often, which is why this
>>> annoyance is not yet fixed. (But here is a ticket:
>>> http://sumo-sim.org/trac.wsgi/ticket/1158 because I do think it is a
>>> defect)
>>> regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-17 14:35 GMT+01:00 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Giving the route and vehicle file to SUMO both via the "-r " flag in
>>>> the correct order solved the errors. But now I am running into a different
>>>> problem again. When running SUMO I get a lot of warnings about discarded
>>>> vehicles because the route file is not sorted. Apart from that, the
>>>> simulation runs and exits normally. So again I run into the problem of the
>>>> route file not being sorted, although it is generated by DFRouter and I did
>>>> not alter it. Because thousands of vehicles are discarded, the scenario
>>>> output becomes unreliable for me.
>>>>
>>>> Now I guess a simple way to solve this is to put both the route and
>>>> vehicle file in the list of additional files in the correct order. This
>>>> simple solution works, the errors about the unsorted route file do not
>>>> occur. But when running the simulation now, the simulation suddenly closes
>>>> with a segmentation fault after 1503 steps. This happens repeatedly and
>>>> both with and without GUI. Apart from some warnings about teleported
>>>> vehicles and changed depart speeds because of close by junctions, the
>>>> simulation seems to run normally up to the segmentation fault. So I guess I
>>>> ran into another bug? I added the scenario for which the segmentation fault
>>>> occurs. I simplified the scenario by removing some files and flags again
>>>> and checked that the fault still occurs. The scenario can be run by running
>>>> sumo or sumo-gui on the provided configuration file.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Pieter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 February 2014 12:52, Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> I think I have finally figured out the underlying misunderstanding.
>>>>> Please read the following (new) documentation:
>>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/SUMO#Loading_order_of_input_files
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sumo-sim.org/wiki/Demand/Routes_from_Observation_Points#How_to_include_the_files
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-02-04 Jakob Erdmann <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> regarding 1)
>>>>>> in config-files,
>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/> and
>>>>>> <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/> should both work. What
>>>>>> error message do you get?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regarding 2)
>>>>>> most likely there is something wrong with the route file itself. It
>>>>>> should generally be possible to use the -r option for route files.
>>>>>> Only if the routes are unsorted (wrt departure time) you need to use
>>>>>> -a because -a does not perform incremental loading but loads the whole 
>>>>>> file
>>>>>> instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note, that in your route file any <route> elements must come before
>>>>>> <vehicle route=""> elements referencing the former.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-02-04 Pieter Loof <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just tried using the --save-configuration option for both DFRouter
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> SUMO. It succesfully creates a config file, but I ran into a few
>>>>>>> small
>>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problem 1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know that the additional files in a .sumocfg file is a
>>>>>>> space-separator
>>>>>>> list, like this:
>>>>>>>      <additional-files value="file1 file2 file3"/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, in whatever way I try to give the additional files as flag to a
>>>>>>> sumo
>>>>>>> command, it keeps saving it to the config file in the wrong format.
>>>>>>> As far
>>>>>>> as I know the flag for additional files should be a comma-separated
>>>>>>> list,
>>>>>>> like this:
>>>>>>>      sumo -a file1,file2,file
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But when I run the command and look at the produced config file, I
>>>>>>> see that
>>>>>>> the commas are stll there, it looks like this:
>>>>>>>      <additional-files value="file1,file2,file3"/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So there are still commas in between, and running SUMO with this
>>>>>>> config
>>>>>>> file gives errors that I do not receive when the list is
>>>>>>> space-separated. I
>>>>>>> tried a few different ways of formatting the "-a <FILE>" using
>>>>>>> commas or
>>>>>>> spaces as separator with and without enclosing braces, brackets or
>>>>>>> quotes,
>>>>>>> but the generated format is never correct. Am I doing something
>>>>>>> wrong?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problem 2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When generating the sumo config file, using the flag "-r <FILE>" to
>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>> the route file, then the route file is written as
>>>>>>>      <route-files value=file/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But when running SUMO using the generated config file, errors occur
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> invalid references to routes. The only solution seems to be to give
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> route file under the "-a <FILE>" flag. If the route file should be an
>>>>>>> additional file, then please fix the config generation process or
>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>> the documentation about providing the route file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Pieter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
>>>>>>> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common
>>>>>>> Pitfalls.
>>>>>>> Read the Whitepaper.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user

Reply via email to