Hi Karl, Yes, we'll check and modify the Battery's documentation to avoid inconsistencies as these.
Regards —————————————————————————— *Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt* e.V. (DLR) Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik | Lilienthalplatz 7 | 38108 Braunschweig *Pablo Álvarez López* Telefon +49 531 295-3457 | *[email protected] <[email protected]>* www.DLR.de <http://www.dlr.de/> | Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik <http://www.dlr.de/ts> 2017-03-23 11:21 GMT+01:00 Hübner, Karl <[email protected]>: > Hi Pablo, > > > > thanks for your reply. > > > > In this case, I would guess to define maximum capacity and actual capacity > of the battery in Wh as well. Otherwise the battery drain according to the > consumption would make no sense. > > However, the documentation and the examples at http://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/ > Models/Electric clearly state that maximum capacity and actual capacity > need to be defined in kWh. > > > > Kind regards, > > Karl. > > > > *Von:* Pablo Álvarez López [mailto:[email protected]] > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 23. März 2017 10:02 > *An:* Hübner, Karl <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Sumo-user CC <[email protected]> > *Betreff:* Re: [sumo-user] WG: high energy consumption for electric > vehicles > > > > Hi Karl, > > > > the energy consumption of the battery output is messed in *Wh*, not in > kWh. We do it so to gain more precision. > > > > Regards > > > —————————————————————————— > > *Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt* e.V. (DLR) > > Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik | Lilienthalplatz 7 | 38108 Braunschweig > > > > *Pablo Álvarez López* > > Telefon +49 531 295-3457 <%2B49%20531%20295-3457> | > [email protected] > > www.DLR.de <http://www.dlr.de/> | Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik > <http://www.dlr.de/ts> > > > > 2017-03-22 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hübner, Karl <[email protected] > >: > > Dear SUMO team! > > We are trying to simulate energy consumption for electric vehicles without > recuperation. To this end, we have taken your example of an electric > vehicle configuration from your wiki and adapted it to what we think might > fit a regular car (see below). However, we found that both - your example > configuration and our adapted configuration - result in high energy > consumption. A one minute drive almost drains 200 kw/h of battery load (log > file attached). What can we do to achieve a more moderate energy > consumption? > > Kind regards, > Karl. > > <vType id="PKW" accel="1.5000" carFollowModel="Krauss" color="red" > decel="4.5000" length="5.0000" maxSpeed="50.0000" minGap="2.5000" > sigma="0.5000" tau="1.0000"> > <param key="maximumBatteryCapacity" value="2000"/> > <param key="vehicleMass" value="1800"/> > <param key="frontSurfaceArea" value="2.0"/> > <param key="airDragCoefficient" value="0.25"/> > <param key="internalMomentOfInertia" value="0.01"/> > <param key="radialDragCoefficient" value="0.5"/> > <param key="rollDragCoefficient" value="0.01"/> > <param key="constantPowerIntake" value="0"/> > <param key="propulsionEfficiency" value="0.9"/> > <param key="recuperationEfficiency" value="0.0"/> > <param key="stoppingTreshold" value="0.1"/> > </vType> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sumo-user
