-----Original Message-----
Frank King wrote:

... Or have I missed something crucial?

[It is still a splendid clock, but I want to
be clear about its design limitations!]

----------

I think we must remember that the timekeeping mechanism driving the
astronomical or astrolabic gearing of the Prague clock is mid 19th
century (and it is itself very interesting - I was privileged to visit
the "insides" of the clock some years ago). By that time, a clock
mechanism kept pretty accurate mean time, so that, once regulated, its
accumulated error from mean time would not be noticeable for many days,
especially on a 24-hour dial. 

However its original predecessor(s) - 1410 and later - would have been
very poor at public timekeeping by our standards, with random errors of
the order of several minutes or tens of minutes per day. Hence it would
need regular correction; and the only instrument conveniently telling
the true time to which to correct it was a sundial. So it
*automatically* would be regulated to - and keep - (local) solar time
without any need to compute the equation of time - which although known
about by scholars was then not even tabulated as we know it. 

Sir George White gave a most interesting lecture a few years ago
expounding the proposition that the English lantern clock in the early
17th century - a very poor timekeeper by modern standards - was in fact
excellently suited to keeping practical time from day to day (and
overnight), which anyway needed to be adjusted to stay in line with
local solar time, as that was then the only standard.

Fortuitously the time zone GMT+1 is fairly close to local mean time for
the Prague clock as it is at 14d 25m East - so the discrepancy is about
2 minutes 19 seconds. It would be far worse off in Seville!

So I suggest that:

- originally the Prague clock certainly kept local solar time, being
frequently adjusted (corrected) to that from its own (very) approximate
timekeeping: 

- when the local time standard become mean rather than solar it would
have still been frequently adjusted of necessity, but I do not myself
know whether to mean or solar time, nor do I know when mean time was
adopted in Prague: 

- after the mid-19th century work it would naturally keep mean time
quite well but could have been adjusted to local solar time if desired: 

- after the adoption of time zones it may or may not have been adjusted
to civil time: 

- and now it is adjusted to CET (UTC+1).  

I suspect the convenience and motivation for keeping civil time is
mostly so that tourists know when to expect the automata to perform,
rather than because viewers will use it to set their watches.

Andrew James



Secure Meters (UK) Ltd. is a registered company in England: 2199653  
Secure House, Moorside Road, Winchester, SO23 7RX
 
This correspondence is confidential and solely for the intended recipient(s). 
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, 
distribute or retain this message or any part of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient please delete this correspondence from your system and 
notify the sender immediately.
---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to