Dear Frank et al,
 
Not one of mine!  I think I recognise it as one of the Connoisseur Sundials 
range.
 
Good news (ish) that the leap second hasn't been abandoned (yet).
 
But the bad (UK) news yesterday was about the upcoming parliamentary vote 
proposing (yet again) that we adopt permanent BST. No further comment needed!
 
Regards,
 
John
---------------------------------------------

Dr J Davis
Flowton Dials

--- On Fri, 20/1/12, Frank King <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Frank King <[email protected]>
Subject: Sundial and the Leap Second
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, 20 January, 2012, 11:38


Dear All,

Patrick Powers has drawn my attention to the
recent non-vote on the future of the Leap
Second. 

Those interested will probably already know
that the vote that was planned for this week
has now been delayed until 2015.

If you Google...

  Leap Second Future  or  Leap Second Vote

You will find more hits than you can cope
with.  The one with the best picture is:
  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2088798/Leap-second-Conference-bigges
t-timekeeping-change-centuries.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

There is a nice view of a sundial resting
on a plinth but not bolted down.

Could this be a Tony Moss or John Davis dial?

The caption "...rendering sundials useless"
is a little over the top in my view!

The impression I get is that the Canadians,
the Chinese and the British are in favour
of keeping leap seconds but the French,
German and U.S. authorities want to get
rid of them.

Would any French, German or U.S. contributors
to this mailing list care to comment!!

Frank King
Cambridge U.K.


---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to