On Nov 16, 2005, at 11:32 PM, David P. Roberts wrote:
Not really, As I understand it, the design philosophy was to remove all
state from the 'system'. Using DDC acomplishes this by dynamically
sensing
the monitor settings. As a result, swapping monitors becomes a simple
matter
of hooking up the new one.
Sure, that's fine...but I'm talking about the ability to *override*
it, that's all.
I suggest the promblem is really with the KVM switch not supporting
DDC -
and yes I have monitors that don't support it too, but they are over 10
years old.
Therefore you should be forced to stop using them for some reason?
IMHO, the original SunRay1 set out on a brave path with DDC for
external monitor sizing and only usb for local peripherals (no serial
or
parallel ports). It's dissapointing to see this vision being retreated
from
slowly. For example the SunRay 170...
I agree, yes...Personally I love DDC, I think it's a great idea. I'd
just like to see the ability to override the settings the SunRay gets
(or doesn't get) via DDC, that's all.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "You'll have to be a lot more specific than
'that
Cape Coral, FL girl last night.'" -Ted McFadden
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
