fitra budi anggoro wrote:

I am still working on these error. It seems the problem not only for the load balance but also with some bugs in SRSS3.1. One of Notes from explorer we've ran "TCBDaemon: packet receive error". I've checked on sun solution, and this is a bug (6240056). It said it is occasionally happen, but it happen quite a lot. Any ide guys?


I wouldn't necessarily worry about this unless you're seeing an
actual problem. The firmware has been known to whine needlessly
in syslog before :-( It's almost certainly unrelated to load
balancing. From what you have described your Sun Rays are not
hanging and showing an icon of 26D, are they? So it doesn't look
like bug 6240056 to me.

Before you send out 3MB of data, which is a lot of data to pore
through, could you try the small tests described in the mail below?
With only two servers it should take only a minute to run these
commands.

Regards,
Bob



I can send you the explorer but it takes 3 MB. Can I send personally to someone who might interested?
Thanks a lot and Warm Regards

Fitra

*/Bob Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

    Also, are these logged in sessions, or only login-greeter
    sessions? utwho -c would be interesting to see. The
    difference between utwho -c and utwho -ac is that the
    latter one counts login-greeter sessions, whereas the
    first form is just logged in sessions.

    What is your policy (output of utpolicy)?

    -Bob

    ottomeister wrote:

    >On 3/27/06, fitra budi anggoro wrote:
    >
    >
    >>I've got 80 clients connected to 2 x [EMAIL PROTECTED] USIV 32 GB. What
    really strange
    >>is 75 clients connected to Server A and only 5 connected to
    Server B.
    >>Shouldn't SRSS 3.1 have Load Balance Capabilities? It should
    have right.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >SRSS tries to balance system load, not number of DTUs, but even so
    >that seems like a very skewed distribution.
    >
    >What do 'utgstatus' and 'uptime' show on each of these machines?
    >
    >If one of the users on Server A logs out, does he then get offered a
    >login on Server B?
    >
    >OttoM.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>


<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com>


_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to