Leigh Porter wrote:
You could probably go lighter still and use a very basic window manager
if all you have is the Windows connector running full screen and no
native apps. You could even remove the window manager altogether I
guess.
On Solaris, if you remove dtsession(CDE window manager) as a CAM
application, you will get the connector running directly on the X
server. Still takes about 60 mb per user total.
Brad
--
Leigh
Brad Lackey - US-SW Desktop Product Lead wrote:
In the scenario below gnome doesn't load
either...
i was describing CAM mode on Solaris... If you're using icewm expect
the 90 mb number to be lower, bu the 60mb number will probably still
hold true.
Brad
John Simovic wrote:
Forgot to mention that I have a generic user (only one) logging in
under icewm. Then a script calls rdesktop to the windows terminal
server. Gnome doesn’t even load.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *On Behalf Of *Brad Lackey -
US-SW Desktop Product Lead
*Sent:* Tuesday, 10 October 2006 10:08 PM
*To:* SunRay-Users mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [SunRay-Users] Thanks for all the advice. Worked a
treat.NOW.....
The processors will likely be close to adequate, but memory is going to
be your short fall...
Each CAM user using uttsc will take about 90 mb of RAM....
If we take your 4096 and subtract some (256) for system overhead and
divide by 90 we get about 42 concurrent users.
If you remove dtsession from your applications list you can save about
30 mb per user.
(4096-256)/60 = 64 concurrent users
Brad
Leigh Porter wrote:
I do not see why it should not cope just fine, I had a V240 with
similar spec and had 30 or so users with lots of apps, lots of hungry
Java development stuff (Eclipse etc) and there was room for more.
--
Leigh
John Simovic wrote:
We have a v880 with 2 933 UltraSparc Processors and 4 gig RAM. This
server
is only serving a login screen for the clients who immediately get a
windows
session via rdp. Will this server cope with 70 clients just being
redirected
to winbloze?
Kind Regards
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
*Brad Lackey*
Desktop Product Lead
US Software Practice
(720) 548-3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
*Brad Lackey*
Desktop Product Lead
US Software Practice
(720) 548-3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
 |
Brad Lackey
Desktop Product Lead
US Software Practice
(720) 548-3339
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
