Kevin,
Does utcapture show anything. Have you tested the MTU.
While this is happening, what does Xsun (runs as root) for this display
show and what does uttsc-bin show? Can you get me some prstat -u UID
and prstat -u root info (try to correlate the display for me to the Xsun
process).
Is there anyway you can help us recreate this?
Kevin Burtch wrote:
>
> Both front-end and back-end (Sun Ray VLAN and LAN interfaces) are set
> to auto resulting in 100/full on both the Suns and the switch ports
> they are connected to.
> (they don't have gig-e switches at that site)
>
> Output of netstat -i shows zero errors.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> On 10/11/06, *Alejandro Soler* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> *Look at the network switch configuration for sunray, and the type
> of conecction (if its full duplex, or half duplex)*
>
> *Cheers *
>
> *On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:11:53 +0000, Ross Morrison wrote*
>
>
> > Kevin,
> >
> > I think I may have seen something similar to what you describe.
> We had three Sun Rays connected via a gigabit switch to a V440
> machine. When we used certain graphic intensive programs the Sun
> Ray's would become unresponsive and in some cases they would lose
> connection to the server entirely. We resolved the issue by
> limiting the network port on the V440 to 100MB to match that of
> the Sun Rays and this resolved the issue.
> >
> > May not be the same but something to check?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ross
> >
> > Kevin Burtch wrote:
>> This is a tough one.
>> > We have a deployment on an island, very remote, using some
in-house
>> > developed software managing sensitive data.
>> > I mention this, as I have never personally *seen* the issue,
and I
>> > won't be able to. We cannot move the software and data here for
>> > reasons I can't go into.
>> >
>> > The problem is:
>> > When a user generates a report, cells are being redrawn on the
>> screen
>> > (that's all I can get out of them). When this happens, they
lose
>> all
>> > responsiveness with the mouse and keyboard until the program
>> finishes
>> > the report.
>> >
>> > CPU load is minuscule (single user on a T1000) on the Sun Ray
>> Server.
>> > The software itself is running on a Windows Terminal Server.
If run
>> > directly, or remotely via a windows PC, it runs in 15 seconds
>> with no
>> > loss in interactiveness.
>> > When run via a Sun Ray, it takes a minimum of 80 seconds and
all
>> > interactiveness is lost.
>> >
>> > What I've tried:
>> > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.0 (released version)
>> > Sun Ray Connector for Windows 1.1 (beta version)
>> > rdesktop 1.4.1
>> > rdesktop 1.5
>> > Applying every patch I can find related to X.
>> >
>> > All have the same problem.
>> > This actually surprised me, as the symptoms are exactly the
same as
>> > those I DID see fixed in Connector 1.1 (we had that problem at
>> another
>> > site). Only the trigger seems to be different (it's not
>> scrolling as
>> > far as I know, just rapid repaints of cells).
>> >
>> > Anyone have any ideas?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kevin
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SunRay-Users mailing list
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>> >
>> >
>
> >
> > --
> >
>
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
