Ken and Sean,
I have twenty T1000 and T2000's in production as Sun Ray Servers. They are
excellent providers for a Kiosk Windows RDP environment. They were never
intended to do FP. Currently we are switching to the T2 based T5120 and T5220
as a alternative for our ageing V440's and 3i servers. The V440's have been in
production for the Solaris based Sun Ray Desktops. We are also replacing all
the T1000's with T5120 because of lack of USB and DVD. The bottom line on
T1000/2000 is don't use them unless you are using them for RDP Kiosk or high
transaction (Non FP) applications.
Dave
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:25:22 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> [SunRay-Users] Opinion needed on Sun T1000/T2000 as SunRay server> To:
> [email protected]> > Sean Clarke wrote:> > T1000 & T2000 aren't meant
> to be steller performers - a Sun guy told me > > something to do with the
> desktop stuff using FP which obviously is a > > week spot on the US T1..> >
> It's not so much the FP, but just the fact that the single thread >
> performance is slower than previous single-core SPARC chips. I've > measured
> compression performance, which doesn't use FP at all, running > over low
> bandwidth, and a T2000 takes about 55% longer to do an > equivalent amount of
> compression as my V280R. It feels commensurately > sluggish in comparison.> >
> > Even more interesting (I think) is a performance review of the new > >
> UltraSPARC T2 range..... anyone?> > We're looking into doing that.> > Kent> >
> > _______________________________________________> SunRay-Users mailing list>
> [email protected]>
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your
"fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
