Lars:

Your suggestion of using utadm -A worked. Thank you very much. This saved my 
sanity.

I still would like to see if someone on the list could tell me if it is 
possible to use 'utadm -a' and if it is, how to do it.

Joe

________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Tunkrans [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 2:45 PM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Can't Configure Dedicated Interconnect w/SRSS 4.1

Hi,

Well - the solaris installer does not start a DHCP server.
Its more likely that you have run the "utadm" setup procedure multiple
times.
Run " utadm -d e1000g0 " to delete the config and check if the DHCP
server is still active with "pntadm"
it should have been unconfigured as well.


If the solaris server only have a singel NIC it is probably better to
set up the NIC
as a Fixed IP adress with the solaris Installer. And Not Use the DHCP
CLIENT when installing Solaris.

So if you use 192.168.1.10 as the fixed adress for the NIC in Solaris ,
even if you don not have a router
I would manually point the server to a router with the adress 192.168.1.1

Then when you install SRSS you can do

# utadm -A 192.168.1.0 ( note the CAPITAL A )

Do not accept the defaults .

set up 192.168.1.10 as both auth and firmware server .
select to server IP addresses from the server.
Select to start DHCP.





Wade, Joseph B skrev:
> Lars:
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> pntadm -L responded with
> '192.168.128.0'
>
> so I guess it makes sense that if I try
> pntadm -C 192.168.128.0, it responds with
> 'Table for 192.168.128.0 already exists.'
>
> I think that the problem may be how I respond to the network setup questions
> when installing Solaris. When the Solaris installer asks is this system 
> networked
> or not, what is the correct answer given that there isn't to be any routing?
>
> Joe
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Tunkrans [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: SunRay-Users mailing list
> Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Can't Configure Dedicated Interconnect w/SRSS 4.1
>
> If you  use a dedicated  sun ray  Network interface I belive that
> SRSS   tries to use    192.168.128.0    as the network number  for this
> interface  is that whats happening  on you r box ?
>
>   # pntadm -L
>
>   Should list  the  networks registerd with the DHCP  server .
>
>  # pntadm -C  192.168.128.0     should register  the desired subnet  for
> DHCP .   Does it ?
>
>
>  //Lars
>
>
>
> Wade, Joseph B skrev:
>
>> Greetings:
>>
>> I have several Sun Rays with old (1.x) firmware. I know that I need to 
>> create a "filling station" to update their firmware because their current 
>> version can't be updated on a shared subnet.
>>
>> So, I have done a clean installation of Solaris 10 5/08 and installed 
>> SRSS4.1 (also tried 4.0). I have the server and the Sun Ray directly 
>> connected into a hub and there is no router in the system. utadm -a e1000g0 
>> runs but when it goes to update the DHCP tables, it returns an error 
>> 'pntadm: The server address is not a valid address.'
>> eer to go on “Tour” of Siberia, but could we wait till late spring? Maybe 
>> summer?
>> svcs | grep dhcp says that the DHCP server is online. However, after reboot, 
>> the Sun Ray just sits at the hourglass with two dashes underneath which I 
>> believe means that the Sun Ray is waiting for an IP address.
>>
>> Have I made a mistake in configuring Solaris or SRSS or is this a bug in 
>> 4.0/4.1? Any help is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SunRay-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> SunRay-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to