В вт, 03/11/2009 в 12:08 +0300, Alexander Pyhalov пишет: > I have also noticed, that SRSS 4.2 is terribly slow on OpenSolaris build > 126. > I compare it with our production SRSS server (SRSS 4.1, SXCE build 97) > and other test server (CentOS 5.4). > In both cases (CentOS and OpenSolaris servers) SRSS 4.2 is much slower > then our production SRSS 4.1 server on SXCE. Hardware is the same in all > cases (IBM blades). > However, I can't be completly sure, that it is SRSS fault, because test > servers use their internal disks, but production server uses EMC Clarion > disk storage... > The screen on test servers is drawn by parts... Quite uncomfortable for > user. > Disabling sock2path trick make work of OpenSolaris server comparable > with CentOS server behavior, but both are quite slow. > > Later we'll make some more honest performance tests (either will put > system on Clarion or use SRSS 4.1, haven't solved yet).
We prefer to think that the reason for degradation in speed is the internal blade's hard disk or some recent OpenSolaris issue. SRSS 4.1 on the same blade with OpenSolaris build 126 works not very fast (desktop is drawn quite slow). The SunRay unit with new firmware (from SRSS 4.2) works quite fast with production server (SXCE build 97, SRSS 4.1). I've tried unit with old fimware version, it works slowly too. So, for now we sure that it is internal drive trouble or some bug in OpenSolaris build 126. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Computer Center of South Federal University _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
