Bob Doolittle wrote: > SRSS is certainly not designed to operate this way :)
That's a little spooky, because it's what I am seeing. Surely there is another explanation then. Thanks for the fast response, by the way. > I presume that the difference is due to changing > loads on your server > and/or network. Aggregate CPU usage has never exceeded 10% in real world usage. I have pushed it above that during stress testing, but that's a different issue. I have never gotten the server port on the switch to exceed 5%. > The only low/high bandwidth issue that comes to > mind is related to using > GB NICs on servers. Sometimes the server can > overrun certain models of > switches which can cause behavior similar to > what you describe. I set hires ticks to one. utcapture show zero packet loss across the board, except one DTU which lost 72 packets when I moved it to another switch port. All DTUs report between 2 and 3 latency. I have no idea what the units are. Is there any traffic monitoring I can do to note the difference between its slow and fast mode? Other than me describing it in an email or videotaping it, what evidence could there be? Thanks again, Marty _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
