I'd say that if a shared server with terminal services works for you, then
you should stick with that solution. Individual virtual desktop machines
(VDI) is typically more expensive and this cost can only be justified if
you have special needs. Brian Madden explains this in his excellent book
"The VDI Delusion".
Rgds,
---
Peter Åstrand ThinLinc Chief Developer
Cendio AB http://cendio.com
Teknikringen 8 http://twitter.com/ThinLinc
583 30 Linköping http://facebook.com/ThinLinc
Phone: +46-13-214600 http://plus.google.com/112509906846170010689
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Leigh Porter wrote:
A little off topic.. But I'm using Windows Terminal Server for user
desktops at the moment. I did have a load of Windows 7 instances on
VMWare which users rdesktoped into but I thought that a little
inefficient so I moved it all to terminal services..
We're a secure NOC environment with about 30 people all pretty much
running exactly the same software at the same time.
Why would you choose individual desktop instances over a terminal
service?
Just wondered!
--
Leigh
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
behalf of Craig Bender [[email protected]]
Sent: 16 November 2012 18:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] uttsc to Win 2012-Based Virtual Instances
Not alone it doesn't, but when I mentioned "you can specify that server
side" I meant the Microsoft Server Side.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
