Thanks Bjoern. Does your last point mean that after the client reconnects it would recover the last known state it had on the failed server, meaning i.e. the same windows opened, same desktop configuration etc? In this case, would that mean that there's also a 'home' sincronization between the failover group servers?
Thanks so much 2014-06-15 18:31 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Rost <[email protected]>: > > So here goes the question: Then what's the benefit of configuring a > failover group? I mean, it's ok that the servers share session information > for the users whose server has fell off, but what's the advantage of this > approach if the session for the user is interrupted and they have to > reconnect? > > - you can set a server to not accept new sessions and wait for existing > sessions to drain out before performing maintenance > - failover groups also do load-balancing for new connections > - when a client reconnects and has an existing session, it will get > redirected there. unlike “just” DNS RR where it could happen that one > client has multiple sessions on multiple servers > > cheers > Bjoern > > _______________________________________________ > SunRay-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users >
_______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
