J.O. Aho wrote: > I have seen how Mozilla started out and now been renamed to SeaMonkey, > one of the bad things that has happen is the adoption of the gtk2 > toolkit, a lot of things has been broken due of gtk2 (that worked fine > in xlib, gtk and qt), now when it's supposed to become a major > improvement, will we get back one of those better toolkits like Nokias QT? > > It's horrible that the Linux version gets different key combinations or > features disabled only for gtk2 is buggy and can't handle things > correctly or is blocking things in a bad way.
I think you're being a bit subjective here. Back when building a qt version was an option, I gave it a try. I immediately trashed it and went back to gtk2. I'm not sure what key strokes you're referring to but it seems to me the majority of globally accepted strokes for gtk2/linux work as designed. I do see some disparity in the way return/enter keys are interpreted, but that is in SeaMonkey only, not FireFox. -- -Rinaldi- "I shot an arrow into the air, and it stuck." -- Graffito in Los Angeles _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey