Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Well soon the SMs I can use will be completely dead end anyways,
since the 2.x versions won't work with WIN98.

Well, Win98 has been abandoned by its creator for a long time now and doesn't get any further security fixes itself, so I see no reason for providing security updates to random applications running there when the operating system itself doesn't get fixes to its known security flaws any more.

Robert Kaiser
Well security is not the only thing that I'm looking for.
I'd like to be running something that's reasonably well performing
and bug free. I might have hoped that 2.x (If it ran on win98)
might have some of the annoyances fixed without introducing
too many new, and wonderful, bugs.
support-seamonkey mailing list

Reply via email to