Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote:
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.
This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code
as Thunderbird 3.0.
Phil
Yes, but the interface options/functionality between the two is
different - most notably in that I can drag and drop Account/NG order in
TB, and I can't in SM. And I just discovered that in TB I can open a
tab for each server/subscription if I want, and those tabs don't close
at shutdown and the state is remembered at the next startup - I really
like that.
The only thing I've seen in TB 3.0 that I don't like so far is that the
Attachment icon in the message tray is displayed too small - but that
could be sufficiently addressed by making it scale in accord with the
user set height of the tray.
Function to the user makes all the difference - not so much what's under
the hood. I'm becoming more inclined to start using TB more.
You can for get that tab thingy I turned that off ASAP. I hate tabs
worth a Passion. and the are memory wasters also.
...maybe that's a PC thing...I got no issues with memory and tabs on my
Macs...
I use a Mac as well I've even used a program built into the Mac OS
that monitors memory usage and over the years I verified that every time
a new tab is opened more memory is used.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
