Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote:
...which brings up a good point - the changes in Thunderbird were/are
actually for the better...on all but on point I can think of.

This is surprising since we share the exact same mailnews backend code
as Thunderbird 3.0.

Phil


Yes, but the interface options/functionality between the two is
different - most notably in that I can drag and drop Account/NG
order in
TB, and I can't in SM. And I just discovered that in TB I can open a
tab for each server/subscription if I want, and those tabs don't close
at shutdown and the state is remembered at the next startup - I really
like that.

The only thing I've seen in TB 3.0 that I don't like so far is that the
Attachment icon in the message tray is displayed too small - but that
could be sufficiently addressed by making it scale in accord with the
user set height of the tray.

Function to the user makes all the difference - not so much what's
under
the hood. I'm becoming more inclined to start using TB more.

You can for get that tab thingy I turned that off ASAP. I hate tabs
worth a Passion. and the are memory wasters also.


...maybe that's a PC thing...I got no issues with memory and tabs on my
Macs...

I use a Mac as well I've even used a program built into the Mac OS that
monitors memory usage and over the years I verified that every time a
new tab is opened more memory is used.


Yes, Phillip, I think that has been stated, here, before. Anew Tab *WILL* use more memory.

As an experiment, open your home page and use your Mac OS memory monitor program to see how much memory is in use.

Now open a new *TAB* and go to another of your favourite pages. When it finishes loading, check the memory usage. Close this Tab.

Open a new Window a go to the same favourite page. When it finishes loading, check the memory usage. Close this Window.

Compare the results.....which uses the more memory, a new TAB or a new window??

(Sure, after you've downloaded the favourite page into a TAB, when you then load it into a new Window, SM will just get the page contents from the Cache, so it will display much quicker, but that's not what we're testing here, are we??)

Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to