On 12/21/2009 5:14 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
snip
Our only chance of keeping SeaMonkey alive at all was to reduce the
amount of unknown code we cannot maintain and replace it with code that
is being maintained by someone else - which meant switching to the newer
Mozilla platform, of which e.g. the new form management code is a part of.
snip
You do have a very valid point.
My concern is, it works both ways. The other side of the coin is, since
this is a volunteer venture, how can we hope that in x number of years,
the new volunteers will not consider the present code "unmaintainable"?
Given all this, I marvel at the fact, at a time when some people just
make outrageous amounts of money by being (too) smart with other
people's hard earned money, some volunteers dedicate time to Seamonkey.
This puts my reluctance with SM2 in perspective and I wish I had the
technical ability to contribute better and more efficiently than by
occasional posts ...
--
John Doue
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
