Daniel wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Terry R. wrote:
On 3/28/2010 6:17 PM On a whim, Beauregard T. Shagnasty pounded out on
the keyboard
Terry R. wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Terry R. wrote:
<snip>
and I believe he overstated the numbers quite a bit. Maybe if the
email was sent as PT& HTML using Word, but not just HTML, and not
the error count either.
Ewww. Word, as the editor for OE, does a *terrible* job of HTML.
Couldn't agree more.
Terry R.
In DreamWeaver they is even a menu item for "Fix Word HTML" :-)
Many moon's ago, I heard that Dreamweaver produced poor HTML, too, so is
there a menu item for "Fix Dreamweaver HTML"??
Daniel
Well except for some items I deliberately added (audio and Flash
Content) my website validates with validator On most pages there are
zero errors
You have choice of methods Code (you write your own code WYSIWYG where
you type in what you want format similar to using a word processor or
page layout program) or mixed where it uses a Split Screen the WYSIWYG
on top and code view on bottom.
That old saw has been around since Macromedia Days. When Macromedia was
basically made fun of.
You can check out for yourself http://phillipmjones.net . You may not
like my taste in Backgrounds or subject matters. I have written in XHTML
1.0 Transitional and according to the W3C Validator most pages show as
have zero warning and zero errors
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
