Bernard Mercier wrote:
I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security.
A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it is
not secure enough.........................*
I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0..
SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok.
Is this a valid test link?
Are there others?
What is your opinion?
Not sure of how much value that test is, but I can tell you there are no
known/published security vulnerabilities affecting SeaMonkey 2.0.4 at
this point (there are some affecting 2.0.3 which are fixed in 2.0.4),
but there are a number affecting every 1.x release, including 1.1.19.
The most current 2.0 release is as secure as it can get for a browser or
mail client right now, to our knowledge.
Robert Kaiser
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
