Dans son message précédent, Paul a écrit : > Bernard Mercier wrote: >> I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. >> A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying it >> is not secure enough.........................* >> >> I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM 2.0.. >> SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. >> >> Is this a valid test link? >> Are there others? >> What is your opinion?
> SM 1117 passed all tests. > "Congratulations! The test has found no vulnerabilities in your browser!" Yes, but as Robert Kaiser pointed out in a reply to me, those tests aren't really meaningful. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
