Paul a émis l'idée suivante : > Bernard Mercier wrote: >> Dans son message précédent, Paul a écrit : >>> Bernard Mercier wrote: >>>> I have discussion in the puppy linux forum about SM security. >>>> A forum member claims that the developers say: *even the devs are saying >>>> it is not secure enough.........................* >>>> >>>> I did a test with this link: http://bcheck.scanit.be/bcheck/ on my SM >>>> 2.0.. SM 2.0.3 passed all tests ok. >>>> >>>> Is this a valid test link? >>>> Are there others? >>>> What is your opinion? >> >>> SM 1117 passed all tests. >>> "Congratulations! The test has found no vulnerabilities in your browser!" >> Yes, but as Robert Kaiser pointed out in a reply to me, those tests aren't >> really meaningful.
> I agree. I also don't see why every one is so worried about > viruses, zombies, etc. Personally I am not worried. I run linux as root (puppy linux) and wine for several years already and never had an issue. But I was engaged in a discussion about this in the puppy linux forum. Hence my post. -- [URL=http://users.kbc.skynet.be/fi001005] *Belgische Ardennen - Ardennes Belge [/URL] _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
