On 4/5/10 8:24 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
> 
>> You might think that images in an HTML-formatted message traverse the
>> Internet embedded within the message.  Actually, images travel
>> separately, as attachments.  Similarly, there is a separate transfer of
>> a file for each image in a Web page.
>>
> I have no idea what you mean by "separately, as attachments" since 
> attachments 
> are part of the message, not in any way separate. Looking at any HTML message 
> with Cntl-U will show you that. That's one of the advantages of HTML mail, 
> it's 
> a package rather than needing a transfer for each image. In an attempt to 
> "speed 
> up" browsers, some load images in parallel, which can result in lots of 
> connects 
> to the web server, and may perceived as a DoS attack.
> 

Some think that images in HTML-formatted E-mail messages are somehow
embedded within the source of the message, that they are in-line.
Instead, images are generally binary files that traverse the Internet as
distinct packets not embedded in the source.  At least that's how
HTML-formatted messages reach my ISP's mail server.

-- 
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Go to Mozdev at <http://www.mozdev.org/> for quick access to
extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other
Mozilla-related applications.  You can access Mozdev much
more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to