"S. Beaulieu" <[email protected]> wrote : > Roger Fink a écrit : >> It wasn't an problem in 1.x, and as I said the developers may choose to >> address it or not. My opinion is that if they only want the program to be >> used in a certain way, then they should really get coercive about it and >> make mail implementation a precondition of getting the browser to launch. >> >> > > Well, obviously, some people already see the current model as being > coercitive, so I don't think making things harder would make them any > better. People *can* use another mail application if they want to. There > just really is no point in using SM in that case, though.
Yes there IS, that's my point. I like the look & feel of the SM browser, not FF or Internet Explorer, but SM. Why do I have to throw out the baby with the bathwater and go to something else, JUST because of a programming problem where they wont let me use my own emailer? -- Jane Galt Property Rights The right to life is the source of all rightsand the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave. Bear in mind that the right to property is a right to action, like all the others: it is not the right to an object, but to the action and the consequences of producing or earning that object. It is not a guarantee that a man will earn any property, but only a guarantee that he will own it if he earns it. It is the right to gain, to keep, to use and to dispose of material values. - Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness Mans Rights, The Virtue of Selfishness, 94.
_______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
