>JeffM wrote : >>Finding a service that isn't run by bozos would be a good plan. >> Jane_Galt wrote: >Webshots is it, pretty much, for HD color photo downloading. > That pretty much sucks. Some competition in that segment would be good. I wonder why there isn't any.
...and Seamonkey is an old Netscape codename. SeaMonkey (CamelCase) is the current suite, descended from the Mozilla suite. >>Jane_Galt wrote: >>[sig] >>>[...]Government does NOT "create jobs"[...] >>> >>FDR, OTOH, **did** put people to work >>and did it while "The Free Market" sat on its thumb. > >Who paid for it? > The citizens of the USA who had been paying taxes thru Coolidge's and Hoover's ostensibly fat years. It's called an investment in the future. ...but I guess if it doesn't show up an a earnings statement, it doesn't count as such to some folks. >Stalin and Pol Pot "put people to work" > Those people were already working.[1] OTOH, in 1933, one in four Americans didn't have a job because of the same kind of laissez-faire markets we saw recently. Corporations have only one goal: Make money...ethics be damned. It is the job of the gov't to regulate the extent of the greed and the Republicans didn't do that in the 1920s nor did the NeoCons or NeoLiberals recently. >but only a free market can create real jobs, not slave pits. > Tell it to the CCC members who had money to send to their families who would have starved otherwise. Tell it to the folks who had TVA jobs and the folks who benefit from the TVA infrastructure today. Tell it to the REA workers who electrified the rural part of the country and the folks who benefit from that today. Tell it to the folks who are being foreclosed on today while the "investment bankers" DON'T actually invest in anything. Your emperor has no clothes. >>Ayn Ran was a complete tool. >> >Ok so you just came out as a marxist. <sigh> > "From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs" seems like a decent baseline for a fair society. You seem to advocate the law of the jungle. ...and Rand was a poseur. As I alluded to, left to their own devices, in an actual jungle the Free Market idiots would all die within 72 hours. >>It would be great to see all the NeoCons and NeoLiberals >>each alone on his own desert island and see how along they'd last >>without government to prop up their sorry posturing asses. > >I'm neither, I wouldnt know. > If you are a Randian, you are one or the other. >Neocons and liberals are all pretty much the same to me, > Note that I said *NeoLiberal*--not Liberal ...and there's not a dime's worth of difference between a NeoCon and a NeoLiberal to me. As for Liberals (I call myself Progressive, actually) next time you DON'T have to work a 14-hour day: Thank a Liberal. next time you have to work with a company's equipment and it DOESN'T tear off your arm: Thank a Liberal. Most of the advances we ever gained were Liberal in origin. >various flavors of forced-collectivists. > Everybody having enough to eat and proper medical care in a society that has huge wealth as a whole seems aberrant to you, huh? That's perverse. . . [1] ...and I won't defend criminals e.g. GWB should be handed over to The Hague. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
