On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Lucas Levrel wrote:


Le 15 décembre 2010, Bret Busby a écrit :

No, I do not try dealing with .tar and .tar.zip or whatever files anymore, for installing software. I have previously stated that my experience of
what
has been involved, is horrenous - it is like something out of a kafkaesque nightmare.

Archives are only containers. That experience you have depends on the contents: sources or binaries.

The cited webpage explicitly mentions Lenny as having the required dependencies.



In the past, with trying to keep up to date with a Mozilla or Netscape web browser suite, by unsing the horrible .tar.zip method of instalation, I had to create a new directory in a particular path, and put the furball into that, then decompress it, and it installed it in a lower level directory, and, due to the way that it all operated, I was having to go down seven levels of directories and beyond, to do the horrible decompress process, and it just became too nasty.

And, in all of that, I then had to find where the executable file was located, and work out how to get the software to run by creating bodgy menu entries or the seven plus level paths for the command line statement required to run the software.

It kind of leads to an understanding as to why some people prefer to slit their wrists.

This is one of the advantages of using package management - it takes care of dependencies, and, it replaces, as needed, software or software components, as they need updating, and, it generally takes care of maintaining menu entries, AND updating software, as updates become available.

Using package management for installing and updating software, is much preferable to the kafkaesque nightmare of using furballs for software.

It is one reason why software for creating packages, is available for software developers, and it makes Microsoft Access 2 and/or Microsoft Access97, far superior to the current Firefox and Seamonkey development - Microsoft Access 2 and/or 97, had an SDK available, which allowed a developer to create an installable, standalone database, that meant that the software could be installed, by more or less clicking install, and away it went, unlike this nightmarish system of using furballs, instead of installable packages.

Unfortunately, it appears that Mozilla, in the Firefox and Seamonkey projects, has not yet advanced to the level of Microsoft Access 2 and 97, or Opera, or, other software that can run on Linux, that uses package management for software installation and maintenance.

As I have previously said - it is a question of whether software is written for the benefit of users, or, for the benefit of the software developers.

--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..............

"So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
  Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
  "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
  A Trilogy In Four Parts",
  written by Douglas Adams,
  published by Pan Books, 1992

....................................................
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to