On 5/15/11 11:47 AM, WLS wrote:
> Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
>> Sun, 15 May 2011 21:14:39 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
>>
>>> The background color of the URL field is
>>> not exactly pale yellow by default, but uses the system color for
>>> tool tips. You could either change that, or if you really want a
>>> custom color, try adding the following to your "userChrome.css":
>>>
>>> @-moz-document url("chrome://navigator/content/navigator.xul") {
>>> .urlbar-security-level[level="high"],
>>> .urlbar-security-level[level="low"] {
>>> background-color: pink;
>>> color: black;
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> Ah, you'll need to mark the style declarations as !important to override
>> the existing ones (I always forget):
>>
>> .urlbar-security-level[level="high"],
>> .urlbar-security-level[level="low"] {
>> background-color: pink !important;
>> color: black !important;
>> }
>>
> 
> I never paid any attention to the URL bar color, but that tweak WFM in 
> SM 2.1RC1 on openSUSE 11.3 Linux. I always wondered why !important was 
> included and now I know. I'm off to remove the code.
> 
> WLS

I rarely paid attention to the pale yellow default.  Changing it to pink
attracted my attention.  Since the whole point of coloring the address
area is to bring attention to the fact that the Web page is secure, I
found pink thus to be better than pale yellow.

-- 

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to