I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1 did not, so far.
To my surprise SM 2.1 loads and renders much faster then SM 2.0.14. on this old system. Windows 2000 PRO (SP4) AMD athlon 2500, Ram 1 GB, Video Ati Radion 7500,64 mb Java based webcams seem to have a more crispy look (more contrast). I don't how that is possible with this old video-card. Thanks Seamonkey team ! Regards, Zanqeutil _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
