On 6/19/2011 11:55 AM PT, Zanqeutil typed:
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was
there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a
week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1 did not, so far.
To my surprise SM 2.1 loads and renders much faster then SM 2.0.14.
on this old system. Windows 2000 PRO (SP4)
AMD athlon 2500, Ram 1 GB, Video Ati Radion 7500,64 mb
Java based webcams seem to have a more crispy look (more contrast).
I don't how that is possible with this old video-card.
Wow, that's impressive! I haven't upgraded due to extension
incompatibilities so I have to wait a little longer. Which video card
are you using?
--
"If you're an ant, and you're walking along across the top of a cup of
pudding, you probably have no idea that the only thing between you and
disaster is the strength of that pudding skin." --Jack Handy from
Saturday Night Live
/\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
