Interviewed by CNN on 19/06/2011 19:51, Ant told the world: > On 6/19/2011 3:08 PM PT, User typed: >>>> I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder >>>> >>>> Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was >>>> there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for >>>> about a >>>> week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1 did not, so far. >>>> >>>> To my surprise SM 2.1 loads and renders much faster then SM 2.0.14. >>>> on this old system. Windows 2000 PRO (SP4) >>>> AMD athlon 2500, Ram 1 GB, Video Ati Radion 7500,64 mb >>>> >>>> Java based webcams seem to have a more crispy look (more contrast). >>>> I don't how that is possible with this old video-card. >>> >>> Wow, that's impressive! I haven't upgraded due to extension >>> incompatibilities so I have to wait a little longer. Which video card >>> are you using? >> >> Hmmmm.... Video Ati Radion 7500,64 mb perhaps? > > Wow, that's old and it is faster? Amazing.
Javascript improvements might have something to do with it. On old machines, Javascript lags are much more noticeable. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Sharp pocket calculator. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
