Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
GerardJan wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 6:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 12:28 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Example:
<http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/map-machine#s=r&c=-56.09018578602696,%20-34.39591415226459&z=4>
The map pane is blank but the rest of the page displays fine.
Internet Exploiter 8 shows the map normally, including the Bing
label,
in case that's any help.
TIA
This requires:
JavaScript: Enabled
Images: Load all images
You indicate you already have enabled JavaScript. To check your image
preference, go to [Edit> Preferences] on the SeaMonkey menu bar. On
the left side of the Preferences window under Category, select
[Privacy&
Security> Images].
Sorry:
Specify how SeaMonkey handles images:
Accept all images
Animated images should loop:
As many times as the image specifies
Manage image permissions:
(no sites listed)
Any other ideas?
No other ideas.
I tried the site with both JavaScript disabled and only loading images
that come from the originating server. I could not get the map.
Then I tried with JavaScript enabled but still only loading images that
come from the originating server. I still could not get the map.
Then I reversed the settings with JavaScript disabled but accepting all
images. I still could not get the map.
Only when both JavaScript was enabled and I accepted all images did I
get the map.
By the way, I disabled the automatic spoofing of Firefox. Thus, this is
not a case of invald sniffing.
Mr. Gallaghers' UA string indicates SM 2.0.14
So the politically correct answer is that he's on an obsolete,
superceded version.
Instruct him to install the pre-release 2.3 beta. :/ :\
Perhaps, perhaps, that will help. :)
I use SM 2.0.14, the 64bits version what comes with Fedora15, and it
works like a champ with Javascript enabled and all images.
Well good for you. But mimicking the postings of some true party line
proponents here :-) , the politically correct answer is as written
above :-)
The :/ or :\ were supposed to produce wry faced smileys. Perhaps
:-\ or :-/ will do better. I am/was trying to be sarcastic.
FWIW, Instructing to "latest stable" is well and good, but I do avoid it
when the issue is likely something else.
In this case people on 2.2, 2.1, and 2.0.14 experienced the site working
fine, which implied the issue was something else. Figuring out what was
different between OPs system and all us other users where it worked fine
was what would help in that case, not a blind "update".
Also Unless the issue is ABSOLUTELY required, I won't instruct a user to
upgrade to any beta/release-candidate/alpha/whatever. I'll happily
accept and recommend people who care heavily about our direction/wish to
test to go on those, and advocate that our beta's are relatively stable,
but see no big need to suggest it.
*IF* there was a fix on a beta that is not on a stable release, I'll
mention it, but along with a workaround if there is one.
--
~Justin Wood, (Callek), SeaMonkey Council Member.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
