On 08/01/2011 02:12 PM, d...@kd4e.com wrote: >>NoOp wrote: >> My point was/is that browsers can (and are) exploited on linux as >> well. That is why it's important to keep updated as security fixes >> become available... regardless of the OS. > > I have no problem with security fixes.
These Firefox security fixes apply to SeaMonkey: SM 2.1 (corresponds to FF 3.6 fixes) - see: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/ <http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox36.html> SM 2.2 (corresponds to FF 5.x fixes) - see http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.2/ <http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html> SM 2.3 corresponds to FF 6 & so far no security issues have been reported so far (at least not publicly that I'm aware of). > > Given all of the complications reported here it is discouraging > to think about an upgrade when it risks functionality. > > Generally I feel pretty comfortable with OpenDNS and Linux, as > well as reasonable caution while online. > > Meanwhile, I will join others in avoiding complication, and > wait for a more-stable release. > > _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
