Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote: > Bill Davidsen schrieb: >> Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle that >> often, and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not >> suitable for business use. > > Actually, Mozilla is trying to work with commercial users to find solutions that work for them while allowing us to ship progress rapidly.
What is the definition that you are using of 'progress'? Is it only new features or wrinkles in the UI, or can it be eradication of existing bugs and misguided UI feature implementations?
Robert, is there evidence to support the hypothesis that Seamonkey users /want/ Mozilla to "ship progress regularly" ? From my reading of this list (which is, of course, biased by my own perspectives), it seems to me that the majority of Seamonkey users would prefer stability and security in preference to regularly-shipped progress. Philip Taylor
_______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
