Chris Ilias wrote:
> Philip, did you see my previous reply to you? About all the work done on
crash protection and performance?
> See
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg27814.html>
Yes indeed, Chris, and it was not my intention to ignore
it. Rather, my point (perhaps poorly made) was that
by tying increased security and incremental bug fixes
to deliberate (or forced, by changes in the underlying
engine or in the Firefox sources) changes in the user
interface (or whatever), a Seamonkey user is now
required to accept the latter in order to benefit
from the former. It was my impression (and I may
have been wrong), that up and till V2.0.14, these
two elements were not bundled : that is, V2.0.14 was
incrementally better than V2.0.x, x < 14, yet there
were no perceivable changes in the user interface.
Now, if I understand correctly, a user wishing to benefit
from post V2.2 security/stability/performance will have
no option but to migrate to V2.3+, even though doing
so may adversely affect his/her user experience.
** Phil.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
