On 11-08-16 1:46 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
That's not what you originally said. You said "with 2.3 almost here,
bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed."
Just because there are UI changes, doesn't mean bugs in previous
versions are not addressed.
Master Ilias,
I'm not sure what you're trying to communicate by referring to me as
"Master Ilias", but if it's a sarcastic insult, that kind of treatment
is not allowed. See
<http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html>. Remember that
we're all people. Be nice.
I wrote " bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 *or upgrade there-to* ..."
So master Ilias, you claim that problems with upgrading from say
SM 2.0.14 to SM 2.2 will be addressed in a later/future SM release?
Would you care to explain how you expect that to work?
Also do you claim to dispute what I write in " Any person who is on
say SM 2.2 ... its own basket of fresh bugs."
If there's a bug regard to updating from from 2.0.x to 2.2 that doesn't
exist when updating from 2.0.x to 2.3, then I think the bug is no longer
valid, because the update mechanism (I think) will bypass 2.2 after 2.3
is released (i.e. 2.0.x user will be offered 2.3). Justin, is that right?
--
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
Newsgroup moderator
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
