Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 11-08-16 1:46 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >> Chris Ilias wrote: >> >>> That's not what you originally said. You said "with 2.3 almost here, >>> bugs with 2.1 or 2.2 or upgrade there-to will not be addressed." >>> Just because there are UI changes, doesn't mean bugs in previous >>> versions are not addressed. >> >> Master Ilias, > > I'm not sure what you're trying to communicate by referring to me as "Master > Ilias", but if it's a sarcastic insult, that kind of treatment is not allowed. See <http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html>. Remember that we're all people. Be nice. Chris, I notice that you find fault with Rostyslaw Lewyckyj's use of "Master Ilias" (which I personally read as indicating great respect, as in Kitagawa-sama v. Kitagawa-san), yet allow to pass without comment an earlier, clearly sarcastic, response : [an earlier contributor] wrote: >> Feel free to write the code, as you already know how it works >> and how stupid the people implementing the current system were. I am sure it is not your aim, but to people new to the list such as myself, this would appear to indicate either bias or favouritism in your response, just as did your earlier deletion of a message from Phillip M. Jones simply because you viewed its contents as containing misinformation ("Firefox running itself into the ground, and Mozilla demanding the SeaMonkey council what to do."). Phillip may well have been misinformed, but any reasonable person reading his contribution would have understood immediately that the views stated were his personal opinion and not asserted as established facts. Philip Taylor. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
