Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) schrieb:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 6 octobre 2011, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) a écrit :

Yes, /Unicode/ plain text. It has characters and
symbols. Why am I denied access to an easy way to
insert them, just because I eschew HTML e-mail ?

I think the rationale (if any) would be that your OS is supposed to
take care of that. If it supports Unicode, it should provide you a way
to produce Unicode chars in *any* application.

(composed in HTML mode, just to see what the effect of this "Insert
characters and features" is)

I am presented with a selectable base character and then all
composite variants thereof : I know of nothing similar in the various
Windows IMEs that approaches this in simplicity, so for me it would
be /very/ convenient to be able to "Insert characters and features" in
exactly the same way that those who elect to compose in HTML can do.
There would seem to be no /a priori/ justification for restricting this
feature to mails composed in HTML.

I currently cannot check this for 100%, as this Insert-option is dysfunctional in my SM. However, since it's specifically in the HTML-insert menu, I'm pretty sure it does not create Unicode, but HTML-code. When I enter a :-) from that very same menu, that's what SM puts in the code:
    <span class="moz-smiley-s1"><span> :-) </span></span>

So I would expect something like &Uuml; to be create by that option.

Having HTML-options only available in HTML mode makes a very good sense.

However, it leaves the issue of Unicode open (see also my other post on this thread).

BR/Philipp

_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to